Cremation: Incinerating the Human Trace


By Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus



It is a known fact that certain indigenous circles of internationalist mockery, who, ignoring the long-standing Christian tradition of our spotless Faith have been penetrating every form of mass communication and through them, the conscience of contemporary man, poisoning it and buckling the bases of the Faith. As such, the indifference regarding the Faith and the Christian traditions, under the influence of the aforementioned, is sending roots into the morally listless and religiously sickly consciences.

Having perceived the signs of the times, and the twists and turns of those moving suspiciously against Her, and in order to safeguard the Orthodox tradition today that the procedure of cremation of the deceased is being fully materialized and suitably prepared, our Holy Church, as a caring mother, has enlightened Her Christ-named flock in an appropriate manner (with Her Encyclical No. 2959/29.10.2014), for the instruction of the Saints and the edification of the body of Christ – per the god-inspired words of the Apostle Paul (Ephes.4:12) – and has stressed to Her members the spiritual dimensions and the consequences of such a choice in the spiritual life of the faithful, by having rejected the cremation of the deceased as an act that is incompatible to Her tradition, thus demarcating Her faith and Her respect for the human person, and by extension, for the human body, which is a temple and a dwelling of the Most Holy Spirit.

Pursuant to the government’s proposal per Article 21 “Choice of burial place” in the Legislative Plan titled “Measures for the acceleration of the Governmental opus and other provisions” – whereby, through the generalized formulation of the provision it becomes compulsory to respect the wish of the deceased either for an ecclesiastic funeral service and in special cases for the cremation of their body – we would connote the following:   The human body is an icon of the immortal soul and a projection of eternity in this world.  The burning of the body constitutes an iconoclastic act, which offends the faith in the eternality of the Church.  The process of a body’s deterioration should be a natural one, and never a forced one.  Nature undertakes the deterioration of the body.  Burning it, is perpetrating an act of violence on the body.  The experience of the Church, which originates from the honouring of holy relics, convinces that relics are spiritually alive, which is why the Church regards burial as an eternal value, whereas cremation is not regarded as a personal right for the faithful members of the Church, inasmuch as it is considered a clearly nihilistic act that denotes the end of a person, whereas on the contrary, burial marks the hope and the expectation of the Resurrection.

Regardless of the arguments it may be based on, the cremation of the deceased resides outside the Orthodox truth which has been defined by the Apostolic word: “So will it be with the resurrection of the dead.   It (the body) is sown in deterioration, it is raised imperishable; 43 it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in strength; 44 it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.  There is a natural body, and there is also a spiritual body. 45  Thus it is written: “The first man, Adam, was made a living soul”; the last Adam (Christ), became a life-giving Spirit.” (1 Cor.15: 42-45).

With the cremation of the deceased, society has subscribed to its nullification. What kind of relationship can a society have with Life, when a society does not accept man in his sickness, his weakness and his death; when a society incinerates its dead; when a society destroys the remembrance of their lives and the reminder to Her members; when a society regards man’s beginning an artificial and selective one and his death a final and irrevocable one; when a society denies the breath of the eternal and entraps itself in the asphyxiation of the ephemeral?  There have been atheists who have sought to preserve their societies’ memory of their terrestrial “gods”, by actually embalming their bodies, as in the cases of Lenin and Mao Zedong.

The result of humanism without God, of civilization without values, of nihilism without a purpose, and the result of atheism’s confusion, has been the riddance of the person – the incineration of even the last vestige of him.  The cremation of the deceased leads to the cremation of human dignity.  Most assuredly, the re-kindling of the entire matter through the relative Legislative Plan will lead to an attempt to gradually deaden people’s sensor of faith.

The meaning of “eternity” is becoming distanced from our life experience. Every single thing that reminds one of it and discreetly underlines it is gradually becoming undesirable to accept and bothersome in practice.  A contemporary thinker has asserted in an article of his – with regard to the anti-metaphysical furor which is being observed – that the professed, modernizing mentality of recent years is an “anti-metaphysical, monomaniacal complex” seated within a “tortuous psychological insecurity”.

The practical and the utilitarian perceptions have prevailed, and have numbed the spiritual and experiential dimensions of events.  The true and the beautiful have become subjugated to the nakedness and the harshness of rationalistic practice.

The detailed reference that is also made by the four Evangelists on the interment of our Lord’s godly Body proves its importance in an undeniable manner.

The same is observed in the hymnography and the hymnology for the Most Holy Mother’s Dormition, for Basil the Great, Hossios Ephraim, the Holy Martyrs – and naturally for all the faithful – in the sublime funeral services.

The celebrations for the translation of precious relics and the tradition and experience of the Church are unshakeable proof of the respect shown to the human body, which comprises a human being’s one hypostasis, and as such, incineration of that body is evidence of a latent disdain for it, as well as disbelief in the resurrection of dead bodies, an exo-Christian belief in metempsychosis or the denial altogether of the existence of the soul.  Consequently, our Holy Church is justified in proclaiming that the incineration of the deceased body is an actual denial of the Resurrection and a provocative proclamation of a nihilistic hue.

The funeral Service is inextricably linked to the visible presence of the human body, not a heap of ashes.  All of the Troparia hymns speak of the “reposed” or “asleep” person not an incinerated one when bidding them the last farewell, and when burying their body, not ashes.  Hence it is easily educed that it is not possible to perform a Funeral Service, either prior to a cremation, or after it, given that in the former case a burial will not follow, and in the latter, there will be no body to bury.

Uninfluenced by the secular spirit, the Church will continue to inter and bury the bodies of Her faithful, which may well also be relics, given that the incorruptibility of relics and their potential to work miracles are both proof of man’s theosis (deification), since the Grace of God can also permeate the entire human body.

The choice of cremation is a sin, and is proof of our erroneous relationship with the Church.  Every deviation from Her teaching is an alienation from the Grace of the living God.  For those who choose cremation of their dead body – and moreso with a public statement of disbelief in the eternal life, or with disrespect and disregard for the Church – we are justified in asserting that there is absolutely no reason for the performing of a funeral Service or a memorial supplication, because what the Church is obliged to respect is the rejection of Her teaching by the deceased himself, and not the relatives’ possible desire (usually for social reasons) to hold a funeral or memorial Service.

These Services presuppose faith and hope in the afterlife by the deceased, and his respect for the Church.  Services are not held for social purposes; they entail prayers and extensive supplications before God by the Church, who expresses Her love for the departed person as faith in the Lord, as hope for salvation, as desire for his partaking in the resurrection for eternity, and as Her petition for the forgiveness of his sins by the Lord.

How can we chant “Blessed is the path that you walk on…” to someone who declares faith in his post-mortem nonexistence?

Consequently, it is impermissible for our Most Holy Church to diminish the absolute character of this teaching of Hers, given that any possible related act would weaken Her relationship with the Truth.

Accordingly, in our God-saved Metropolis and with absolute respect – both towards the free choice of free persons, but also towards the commandments and the dogmas of our Most Holy Church – we hereby make known to everyone that we will not be permitting the performing of funeral or memorial Services to whoever wittingly chooses the cremation of his body, thus actually denying the Resurrection of the dead. This is the most silencing response to all the sycophantic rumors that the Church’s negative stance supposedly involves financial reasons.

+ SERAPHIM of Piraeus

Translation by A.N.

Originally posted here:



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s